What the marketing campaigns say about ad agencies and marketers of Robi, GP, Airtel and Banglalink?
Are the mobile operators of Bangladesh spending too much on their
marketing campaigns? Frequent campaigns by the mobile operators are in many
cases not inter-related and in some cases lack creativity. Some TV commercials in fact
have nothing to do with a service of a company; it seems ads are created and
shown just to be in the mind of existing users. Are the mobile operators and their
advertising agencies spending it right? Or they are just spending
it for the sake of carrying out marketing campaigns?
A business school instructor of North South University, who
worked for a leading advertising agency in the past, Galib Mohiuddin, had this
on his Facebook wall last week: The telco campaigns in Bangladesh only tell me
that they now have too much marketing budget to allow such creative to pass. I
guess an FMCG would be much more cautious in spending every penny even with
rocketing revenues. Telcos in Bangladesh used to do the same a couple of years
back when they had less marketing budget. Exposure frequency is not the only
thing in marketing. It doesn't say a lot about our telco marketers.
Shabab Din Shareq, who is working in an advertising agency
and actively looking after a telco account participated in the discussion and said
"I know we (telco and agency) have bombarded the mass media with frequent
campaigns. Sometimes the creatives are not up to the mark. But surprisingly,
the Brand Health Study report we get shows overwhelming results which probably
pushes the telcos to go for more. The competition is too tight. Head-to-head
products. Absence of ads (a particular product) reflects on the revenue
figures. I don't know how it happens but this is the truth.
Galib Mohiuddin responded to Shabab's point by saying
"Nothing wrong with media bombardment, telcos look for memorability and
emotional attachment. Media bombardment will definitely reflect positively on
brand studies with a three-month window.
Further, it is the job of a brand management professional in the client
side to ensure quality of a particular TVC. Agencies tend to do what clients
like. And research agencies twitch to please clients and get future businesses.
A lot of them present flowery picture to all competitor clients from the same
industry."
Shabab Din Shareq pointed out that the market is almost
saturated. He added "The positioning is almost clear to the mass. Loyal customers remains
loyal. At this moment telcos fight for the floating customers - who only look for benefits not anything else.
Customers whose phone number is not their identity. Each carry more than one
SIM and keep on changing depending on the product offered by the telcos. It is
quite risky to go for more of thematic campaigns where competitors will be
vigorously promoting their products and offers."
Galib Mohiuddin said in response that the marketers’ job is
to increase loyalty, to shift less loyal to more loyal, and to give additional
reasons to consumers to switch to a brand beyond functionality. He said "Take the
toothpaste market or cola market for example. These have been there for ages.
The cola product is only water, sugar, coloring, flavour and carbonation;
differentiated only by image, and has been there for more than 100 years as a
branded product."
Shabab Din Shareq in his last response said that "As I
was saying, the floating customers are price seekers. Loyalty campaigns would
have been logical if there were service seekers. Isn’t it? On the other hand
Cola or Toothpaste customers are almost never price seekers. Image building
communications are justified for them.”
Aziz Hakim, who is working for a leading telco for nine years had some points to share to the discussion. He said "Just a
random comment on telecom industry reality check - I know many people who spend
60,000tk + on new mobile phones, but when it comes to call rate they start
hishabing poisha. If you care , kichu awareness er bapar ache for mobile
industry consumers."
Hakim added that "Europe , America , Australia or Japan
, meaning the 1st world countries… okhane je dame telecom hardware &
software kena hoy from IBM or Mircosoft or SAP or Oracle , amader BD te telecom
operator rao eki dame or aro beshi dame kine due to high taxes or immature
market conditions. But when it comes to selling of service, with the same or
more cost than 1st world carriers , BD mobile operator der revenue is 30/40
times less per consumer, resulting BD being one of the most cheapest mobile
service rates country in the WHOLE WORLD. Same cost as the west, lowest revenue
per subscribers in the world. But bd telecoms don’t get a very encouraging
gesture from the educated consumers side.
There are many people I know who don’t mind to spend 60,000
+ tk on the latest model handset but call rate er bepare poishar hisab kore ,
regardless of inflation and price hike of all the commodities imaginable, from
generator fuels to run the BTS to tax+ btrc jaw which eats out close to 60 % of
revenue ( not profit ).
Bangladesh is one of the few countries of the world where
network coverage is more than 95% of population and call rate is one of the
cheapest in the world. No other industry in the country gives so much and takes
so little, no other industry is as transparent and highest tax paying as
telecom."
Then Hakim suggested a lethal scenario, which was
nevertheless, pointed to all the mobile users of the country "Think
yourself without a mobile for an hour and then judge the price of NOT having a
mobile service".
Galib Mohiuddin said "Aziz, I am not arguing the merit
of telco products or rates. Consumer insights like the ones you mentioned are
important in devising telco products. I am pointing to the fact that "If
you are going to spend money on marketing, spend it right."
Aziz Hakim said in return that "I totally agree on the
ill/in effective spending on the marketing, in the mean time so called
marketing agencies are earning millions $. I would rather put the budget on
loyalty programs and lifestyle benefit offerings for consumers and business
customers.”
Tousif Jamal, a management employee of Unilever, participated
in the discussion and said that "Telco companies in Bangladesh do not have
a solid brand proposition and they tend to swindle around with trends. Take GP
for example, a campaign during Eid on missed calls with Ishana, then a campaign
with Ananta, then an ad with unknown faces on the double recharge. None of
these campaigns are linked to the core theme/essence of Cholo Bohodur. How is
Ananta even associated with GP? Just because he is the talk of the town (and
when town I mean the metro cities, is Ananta also popular to a farmer in
Gaibandha?). The same goes for Robi, who recently launched a football predictor
game on facebook. How is that even relevant to their core theme/essence of
'Jole Uthun Apon Shoktite'? I came to know that it’s a six months campaign. So
you have a company talking about football for six months, cricket for the next
(T20 WC 14), then what next? Kabadi?"
Tousif Jamal further commented that “Just bringing in an
example from FMCG since you made the comparison. Take Dove for example. Dove
has been speaking about Real Beauty for years now and it will continue to do.
It's an unbeatable proposition, a strong differentiation, and you see that in
each and every communication of Dove. Our Telcos, unfortunately, haven’t been
able to crack it.”
Galib Mohiuddin agreed with Tousif Jamal and said “Telco marketers need to move beyond understanding generic brand management to
more specialized industry brand management where they depend more on consumer
understanding above surface level. Statistics/metrics may prove a point; but the
consumer market is not statistics/metrics."
Galib Mohiuddin cautioned that if marketers start believing
that marketing is a money game, then market shares would never change. He said in concluding paragraph that "Such a
person should quit marketing. End of the day, all consumers are price seekers." He
ended the discussion by saying that "If you don't have a solution to a
problem, it doesn't mean there is no solution. It only means you don't have the
solution right now."
The reason for this post is that I read an advertising blog the other day and it was clear to me that the blogger had no clue how agencies make money.
ReplyDeleteSo I thought -- as a public service -- I'd do a little series on the economics of the ad business. But don't be frightened. I'll make it so simple even an account planner can understand it. Art directors I can't guarantee. ad agencies